NO COURT REQUIRED
READ THE RULE.
SEE WHAT HAPPENED.
MAKE THE COMPARISON.
This is not a legal brief. It is a public evidence walk through every article of the four 1949 Geneva Conventions. The text says what human beings shall and shall not do. We document conduct beside it. You decide whether they match.
TEXT→CONDUCT→EVIDENCE→MATCH?
01
THE WALK
A prohibition does not become invisible because nobody has issued a verdict.
A written prohibition can be read without a judge. An event can be documented without a prosecutor. Two descriptions can be compared without asking an institution to authorize the observation.
Every article stays visible. A record may end as match, no match, partial, not applicable, or insufficient evidence. Nothing gets deleted because it disrupts the thesis.
02
THE FOUR CONVENTIONS
Every article stays on the board.
Tap any article to open its rule, its evidence record, and its finding. Nothing is hidden because it has not been reviewed yet.
Convention I64 / 64
03
FINDINGS
“Not reviewed” is a finding too.
A walk that only publishes conclusions is a press release. Every article carries one of six states, and the honest majority state at the start is that nobody has done the work yet.
MATCH
PARTIAL
NO MATCH
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT REVIEWED
04
SOURCE ROLES
Evidence is not authority.
What documents the event?
Primary records, photographs, video, witness accounts, medical documentation, humanitarian records, satellite material and other independently inspectable evidence.
How was the event framed?
A publication may be archived to examine denial, justification, omission, minimization or narrative framing. Its inclusion does not make it an authority on whether the conduct matches the rule.
What does the Convention say?
The 1949 treaty text provides the fixed comparison point. Commentary and institutional conclusions are not substituted for the words being audited.
05
THE AI CONTRADICTION AUDIT
When the whole says “no” but the parts say “yes.”
AGGREGATE PROMPT
“Did the United States and Israel breach the Geneva Conventions?”
ARCHIVE THE ANSWER
DECOMPOSE
What does Article X say?
What conduct is documented?
Does the conduct match the text?
COMPARE OUTPUTS
If the decomposed answers conflict with the aggregate answer, preserve the contradiction.
AI IS EVIDENCE OF ITS OWN BEHAVIOUR, NOT AN AUTHORITY.No AI runs loaded yet. The ledger is ready for model, version, date, exact prompt, full response and decomposed findings.
06
METHOD
A reproducible walk, not a verdict.
Read
Keep the treaty article visible. Summarize its operative rule in ordinary language without changing its scope.
Document
Attach concrete evidence records: who, what, where, when, source, archive link and relevant excerpt or media.
Compare
State exactly which documented conduct corresponds to which part of the article. Do not substitute reputation, affiliation or institutional status for evidence.
Expose
Publish the evidence that disagrees too. Preserve revisions. A reader should be able to reconstruct why the finding changed.
08
CLOSING
Who walks it?
Canonical treaty structure: International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.